next up previous
Next: Structure-Driven Glyph Placement Up: A Taxonomy of Glyph Previous: Glyph Placement Strategies

Data-Driven Glyph Placement

In data-driven placement, the data are used to compute or specify the location parameters for the glyph. The two categories of this strategy class are raw and derived.

In raw data strategies, one, two or three of the data dimensions are used as positional components


  
Figure 3: All pairwise raw data-driven views (star glyphs) of the Iris data set: (a) sepal length vs. sepal width, (b) sepal length vs. petal length, (c) sepal length vs. petal width, (d) sepal width vs. petal length, (e) sepal width vs. petal width, and (f) petal length vs. petal width. Note that while each view separates one iris family (sailboat shape) from the other two (kite shape), varying degrees of separation can be seen within the large cluster. Also, some views reveal a number of outliers.
\begin{figure*}
\hbox{ %
\fbox{
\psfig{figure=iris12.ps,width=.28\textwidth}}\hs...
...idth}(d)
\hspace*{.30\textwidth}(e)
\hspace*{.30\textwidth}(f)
\par\end{figure*}

A derived data placement technique uses an analytic process to generate positions using the data values as input.

Post-processing can involve distorting positions to reduce clutter and overlap.


  
Figure 4: Star glyphs of Iris data set with position based on the first two principal components. Reasonable separation can be seen in the large cluster between larger and smaller 'kite' shapes.
\begin{figure}
\centerline{\psfig{figure=irispca.ps,width=3.25in}}
\end{figure}


next up previous
Next: Structure-Driven Glyph Placement Up: A Taxonomy of Glyph Previous: Glyph Placement Strategies
Matthew Ward
1999-02-08